HMOs And Birth Control

American Voices

August 26, 1998 | ISSUE 34•04

HMOs do not cover birth control, a fact that has angered many people in light of HMOs' coverage of Viagra. What do you think?

If HMOs are made to cover birth control, what's next–diphtheria vaccinations?

William Ormond
Lawyer
If HMOs refuse to pay for birth control, they should at least make up for it by performing as many unnecessary Caesarian sections as possible.

Lonnie Samms
Graphic Designer
My HMO didn't cover birth control. Now they cover Brianna, Michael, Ashley, Renee, Devon and Jasmine.

Samantha Eccles
Cashier
That's okay if HMOs won't pay for birth control: Sheila says it totally makes you pork out.

Alicia Donegan
Student
HMOs should stop paying for cancer treatment, as well. That just encourages people to get cancer.

Chris Reiner
Personal Trainer
Birth control should not be covered because it's a lifestyle choice. Viagra, on the other hand, saves lives.

Benjamin Schell
Math Teacher

Spanking Doesn't Work

02.09.12 | ISSUE 48•06

A study published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal analyzed two decades of research and found that children who were punished physically became more aggressive over time, while those who weren't became less aggressive.
Smoking Speeds Mental Decline

02.08.12 | ISSUE 48•06

A study published in Archives Of General Psychiatry found that middle-aged men who smoked had diminished cognitive skills, the equivalent of having aged an additional 10 years.
Migrating Whooping Cranes Stall In Alabama

02.07.12 | ISSUE 48•06

Nine whooping cranes that had been following an ultralight aircraft as it guided them on their migratory route stopped when they reached Alabama, 500 miles short of the intended destination.
Florida Millionaire Adopts 42-Year-Old Girlfriend

02.06.12 | ISSUE 48•06

A 48-year-old West Palm Beach millionaire and polo club founder has adopted his 42-year-old girlfriend in an apparent bid to avoid paying out a wrongful death lawsuit.
Should Sugar Be Regulated?

02.03.12 | ISSUE 48•05

In a recent editorial in the journal Nature, researchers from the University of California–San Francisco suggested that as a toxic substance, sugar should be taxed and regulated like alcohol or tobacco.