Without greater action to prevent global warming, melting arctic permafrost could cause $70 trillion in economic damages between now and 2300, according to a study published in Nature Communications. What do you think?
“I thought the whole reason we named it permafrost was to make sure it never melted.”
Eric Swift • Kiosk Architect
“Thankfully, ‘damage’ really doesn’t sound as bad when you put ‘economic’ in front of it.”
Zaine Sloan • Paperwork Reviewer
“Christ, the permafrost is never going to turn a profit, is it?”
Joanna Pope • Tag Cutter